Compelling Church Part 2

So what does make church compelling? I actually don’t think there is one single answer to this question. Clearly different people find different things compelling.

The other important thing to keep in mind is that, ‘compellingness’ is not the only criteria by which to judge a church service. It’s first and foremost an opportunity to meet as God’s people to meet with him and to encourage each other. As such, prayer, Bible reading, Bible teaching, praise and mutual encouragement are non-negotiable, however compelling or otherwise they might be.

With that in mind, here are some thoughts on being compelling.

1. Relational warmth is a big key to compelling church. Love is supposed to be the defining characteristic of God’s people. And I think a warm and loving community that shows that love to visitors will cover over a multitude of other less compelling features of church. I was talking to a guy on Saturday who goes to a church where I was a student minister in 2002. And he came up to me and said ‘You were the first person who said hello to me when I arrived at church. I can remember we came in and sat down. And you came straight up and introduced yourself, and we thought this is pretty good, and we’ve been here ever since.’

You can’t manufacture relational warmth, but you can help your services reflect relationship warmth with good welcomers, warm and smiling service leading and having morning tea afterwards.

2. A length of service that matches the gifts of those leading. If you have music lead by professional musicians, An internationally renowned speaker and a full time pastor in charge of running your church service who spends his whole week putting together the program, you can probably run a very compelling 2hr church service. The average suburban church however, that has a pretty standard program every week and a normal faithful preacher should probably keep to 1hr.

I can’t see any Biblical reasons why longer is better. The Lords prayer indicates that prayers should be clear and to the point. And everything I can see about preaching suggests that simple to the point preaching is to be preferred to long involved sermons.

From a purely pragmatic point of view, I find nothing less compelling than a drawn out church service. There are certain settings and certain preachers where I am happy to listen to 35min plus sermons. But on the whole I think it’s un-necessary and un-compelling.

On the topic of timing I also think it is compelling to have consistent timing. If people know that they are coming for a 1.5 hr service every week, then that’s fine. But if it’s 1hr one week and 1.5 the next week, then it is not at all compelling.

3. Congregational Involvement. I think it’s compelling to have people from the congregation involved. It’s relational, and it communicates that this is a community/family, not just a minister. Some care of course needs to be taken to get the congregation involved in a way that uses their gifts appropriately.

4. Good Music. This is just a pragmatic thing. Good music is more compelling than poor music. I’d also argue that unless you’re going to focus in on a particular demographic, contemporary music is the most compelling for the most people.

I can’t see that the amount of music in the service is a Biblical issue. If the songs have rich biblical lyrics I can’t see a theological downside to people singing more. There is however the pragmatic rule that I established above about length and gifting.

These thoughts are a bit random, and I would actually be very interested in seeing more research about what people do find more and less compelling about Church, rather than just relying on anecdotal evidence.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Compelling Church Part 2

  1. Anthony Douglas says:

    Hmm. One thing stood out – the length of service one.

    If a sermon is more effective when it’s unexpected, is a service any different?

    Our services too easily become formulaic, predictable. Open with two songs, kids spot, announcements. etc, etc. I take it that this is not so compelling after a few identical weeks. But doesn’t this militate agaisnt a totally predictable length of service? I too am unsure…

  2. apricho says:

    I’m open to the idea that a varied program is helpful – definitely something for me to think about. I am not convinced that this includes a varied length. I’ve never heard anyone say – ‘our service went for an extra half an hour today and it was excellent’. I have heard countless comments in the reverse (and from a variety of people in a variety of churches).

    • Anthony Douglas says:

      At the most banal level…we regularly go an extra fifteen minutes for the Lord’s Supper, and I’m sure that some of the time that’s seen as worthwhile 😉

      Another hit this year was a skype interview with a newly arrived missio – definitely worth the time it took.

      But half an hour does seem to be an excessive variation. Says me, who’s done it many times!

  3. Joanna says:

    I agree entirely about relational warmth being compelling. Our church is pretty hit and miss on all the other things you mention but people who start attending always mention the friendliness. But I think that is related to the issue of transitory congregations – unless you have some longer term relationships undergirding the congregation, it’s hard to have a sense of really solid relationships.

    • apricho says:

      I think relational warmth can be a real strength for smaller churches. The only danger is that it’s easy for the friendliness to be just among insiders. One church growth guy calls 35-100 attendance churches collies because they are very friendly, but can bark at strangers!

  4. Laetitia says:

    There are times when I see who is rostered on for preaching the following week and, I confess, I contemplate not going – much as I might love the person concerned as a person, I find that I expect he or she to waffle, repeat themselves and generally bore me silly with milk instead of something solid. It doesn’t help if they then take twice as long as some of the other speakers would making the same point, especially if I tune out because then they may as well not have spoken at all since I will have missed it altogether.

    And yes, we have stayed in some places because we were greeted well when we first got there. Generally such places are ones where there is genuine voluntary involvement by a majority of the congregation in some aspect of church life.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s